Bengaluru Central Crime Branch police arrested RTI activist Snehamayi Krishna late Friday over accusations he circulated a fabricated audio recording and altered online material to damage the reputation of Karnataka Administrative Service officer DB Natesh. Natesh, who previously served as commissioner of the Mysore Urban Development Authority, or MUDA, lodged the complaint that prompted the case registration on February 18, authorities said.

Officers searched Krishna’s home in Gundu Rao Nagar, Mysuru, and seized documents along with electronic gadgets believed connected to the disputed posts. Police transported Krishna to their Bengaluru office for questioning. His son claimed authorities failed to notify him of the arrest. CCB officials countered that they adhered to all legal procedures throughout the raid and interrogation.

Krishna has drawn attention for his recent activism on alleged MUDA irregularities. He joined two others in filing a petition with Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot urging prosecution of Chief Minister Siddaramaiah over supposed improper land allotments by the agency. Krishna also petitioned the Karnataka High Court to contest related administrative decisions.

The dispute intensified after the state government elevated Natesh to Chief Executive Officer of the Karnataka State Khadi and Village Industries Board. Krishna then posted public claims that bribes secured the post, accusing Natesh of payments to top officials including Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh. No official confirmation exists for those bribery assertions.

Investigators continue probing the matter. Digital forensics experts are examining the confiscated devices to confirm whether the audio clip and other content were falsified, police stated Saturday.

The detention has ignited debate across Karnataka’s political landscape. Opposition leaders and activist groups question whether it stifles free speech amid online activism. Supporters of the action emphasize accountability for spreading unverified material that harms public servants.

MUDA has faced scrutiny for months over site allotments, especially those reportedly favoring influential figures. Krishna positioned himself as a key whistleblower, using right-to-information requests and social media to highlight perceived corruption. His arrest marks a sharp turn, shifting focus from agency practices to his own methods.

Natesh’s promotion, announced recently, fueled fresh allegations from Krishna. He shared the purported audio clip online, suggesting it captured discussions of illicit payments. Police now treat that clip as central evidence in their case against Krishna.

Legal experts note that India’s laws on defamation and electronic evidence have tightened in recent years. Cases involving manipulated digital content often hinge on forensic results, which could take weeks. For now, Krishna remains in custody as the probe unfolds.

Reactions poured in quickly. Congress party affiliates defend the police move, calling it a stand against misinformation. BJP spokespersons decry it as retaliation against a government critic. Civil society voices urge caution to protect whistleblower rights without endorsing fabrications.