Former reality TV star Spencer Pratt did not advance to the Los Angeles mayoral runoff election, securing 25.8% of the vote in the June 5 primary, according to NBC. Councilwoman Nithya Raman. With 28.5% of the vote. Will face incumbent Mayor Karen Bass, who received 34.3% of the vote.

Pratt’s Campaign and Background

Spencer Pratt, best known for his appearance on the reality TV show The Hills, decided to run for mayor of Los Angeles after losing his home in the Palisades fire last year. His campaign focused on local issues and the need for reform in city governance.

Claims of Election Fraud

Following the results, some Republicans have alleged that the election was not conducted fairly. Arizona GOP Congressman Abe Hamadeh wrote on X, “It’s clear, California is incapable of running free and fair elections consistent with our Constitution that guarantees a republican form of government for states.” He called for the federal government to take over the election process.

President Donald Trump shared Hamadeh’s post on Truth Social and captioned it, “No way this could have happened. Rigged Election!” The claims, however, have not been supported by official election authorities or investigations.

Public Reaction and Election Outlook

Pratt’s campaign was notable for his celebrity background and his personal connection to the city through his loss in the Palisades fire. Despite these factors, he was unable to secure enough votes to move forward in the race. The November runoff will see Raman and Bass compete for the mayoral position, with both candidates representing different political approaches to city governance.

The election results highlight the challenges faced by candidates with non-traditional political backgrounds in a city known for its diverse and often polarized electorate. While Pratt’s campaign drew attention, it did not translate into sufficient support to meet the threshold for advancement.

As the city moves forward, the focus will be on the runoff between Raman and Bass, with voters expected to weigh their platforms and policies in the final decision. The outcome will shape the future of Los Angeles governance and determine the direction of city policies for the next term.