The US government attorneys told a federal judge on Tuesday that the Department of Homeland Security still intends to deport Kilmar Ábrego García to Liberia, even though a new agreement with Costa Rica allows for the acceptance of deportees who cannot legally be returned to their home countries.

Background on Ábrego García’s Immigration Status

Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadorian national, has become a focal point in the immigration debate after he was mistakenly deported to El Salvador last year, and Since his return, he has been fighting a second deportation to a series of African countries proposed by homeland security officials.

US district judge Paula Xinis. Of Maryland, previously barred ICE from deporting him or detaining him. She has written that the agency has no viable plan to actually deport Ábrego García, referring in February to “one empty threat after another to remove him to countries in Africa with no real chance of success.”

Ábrego García has argued that if he is going to be deported, it should be to Costa Rica, which previously agreed to accept him. However, Todd Lyons, the acting head of US Customs and Immigration Enforcement, said in a March memo that deporting Ábrego García to Costa Rica would be “prejudicial to the United States.”

Reasons for Targeting Liberia

Ábrego García should be sent to Liberia because the US has spent government resources and political capital negotiating with the west African nation to accept third-country nationals, Lyons wrote.

At a Tuesday hearing in Xinis’s court, Ernesto Molina, director of the Department of Justice’s office of immigration litigation, suggested that Ábrego García could “remove himself” to Costa Rica. Xinis pointed out that the DoJ is prosecuting him in Tennessee on human smuggling charges, as she called it a “fantasy” to say that he can remove himself anywhere while the criminal case is pending.

Xinis set a schedule for a briefing on the matter and scheduled a new hearing for 28 April. Ábrego García, 30, has an American wife and child and has lived in Maryland for years, but he immigrated to the US illegally as a teenager.

Legal and Political Context

In 2019. An immigration judge ruled that he could not be deported to El Salvador because he faced danger there from a gang that had threatened his family. By mistake, he was deported there anyway last year. Facing public pressure and a court order, Donald Trump’s administration brought him back in June, but only after securing an indictment charging him with human smuggling in Tennessee.

He has pleaded not guilty and asked the judge to dismiss that case — the ongoing legal battle has highlighted the complexities of deportation policies and the challenges faced by undocumented immigrants in the US. The case also shows the broader debate around immigration enforcement and the use of third countries for deportation purposes.

The US government has been seeking to deport Kilmar Ábrego García to Liberia despite the new agreement with Costa Rica, which could provide a more viable solution for his deportation. The case has drawn attention from legal experts and advocates who argue that the current approach is not only ineffective but also inhumane.

As the court case continues. The focus remains on whether the US government will follow through with its plans to deport Ábrego García to Liberia or if it will consider alternative solutions. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for future deportation policies and the treatment of undocumented immigrants in the US.